{"id":675,"date":"2019-10-28T05:37:42","date_gmt":"2019-10-27T18:37:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.realclimaterecords.com.au\/?p=675"},"modified":"2019-10-28T05:37:42","modified_gmt":"2019-10-27T18:37:42","slug":"bureau-fixes-embarrassing-graph-from-andrew-bolts-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.realclimaterecords.com.au\/?p=675","title":{"rendered":"BUREAU “FIXES” EMBARRASSING GRAPH. From Andrew Bolt’s Blog"},"content":{"rendered":"

https:\/\/www.heraldsun.com.au\/blogs\/andrew-bolt\/bureau-fixes-embarrassing-graph\/news-story\/f5f582fa52c38da35c27baff3d58fa66<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n

The Bureau of Meteorology again does some “rebirthing” of embarrassing data – this time of a graph it took down that showed 1952 had the highest “number of very hot days” and 2011 the lowest.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

The graph is now back, but … wow, how convenient.<\/p>\n

Craig Kelly:<\/a><\/p>\n

Not only did the Bureau\u2019s [old] graph showing the year 1952 as having the highest \u2018number of very hot days\u2019 (and the year 2011 with the lowest number) disappear down a memory hole – but a new \u2018rectified\u2019 graph has appeared in another section of their website.<\/em><\/p>\n

And surprise, surprise – the year 1952 no longer has the highest \u2018number of very hot days\u2019. The old graph recorded 21 very hot days in 1952, while the new \u2018rectified\u2019 graph shows only 16 very hot days.<\/em><\/p>\n

Further, for the year 2011 – which embarrassingly for Alarmists previously had the lowest \u2018number of very hot days\u2019 going back to 1910 – the Bureau has skilfully been able to find another very hot day for 2011, (I wonder where it was hiding ?) so that year no longer holds the lowest record !<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

<\/h1>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

\n
    \n
  • <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    https:\/\/www.heraldsun.com.au\/blogs\/andrew-bolt\/bureau-fixes-embarrassing-graph\/news-story\/f5f582fa52c38da35c27baff3d58fa66 The Bureau of Meteorology again does some “rebirthing” of embarrassing data – this time of a graph it took […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[657,662,661,658,85,659,660],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimaterecords.com.au\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/675"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimaterecords.com.au\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimaterecords.com.au\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimaterecords.com.au\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimaterecords.com.au\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=675"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimaterecords.com.au\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/675\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":676,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimaterecords.com.au\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/675\/revisions\/676"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimaterecords.com.au\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=675"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimaterecords.com.au\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=675"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.realclimaterecords.com.au\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=675"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}